APPLICANT: V V C V-Vehicle / VVC

APPLICANT: V-Vehicle AKA VVC

Google Ventures & The Lesson of V-Vehicle

Google’s venture capital arm, Google Ventures, which now counts 10 companies in its publicly announced portfolio, has been operating for about a year now, but it wasn’t until Monday that the company invited reporters down to Mountain View for a progress report. During the event Google Ventures execs reportedly emphasized that the fund plans to invest at least $100 million per year into startups across various industries, will be shooting for better than average venture capital returns (more than 1 in 10 investments would make money), and also that the fund is for-profit, meaning Google Venture’s investments won’t be just for the sake of acquisition. (See GigaOM senior writer Liz’s What Entrepreneurs Should Know About Raising Money From Google Ventures)But because Google Ventures is going out of its way to operate as a VC fund, and notably has been investing significantly outside of its core web competency, it — like other VCs — will have to brace itself for those other 9 startups that merely break even or lose money. In particular its investment into V-Vehicle, a startup working on high-efficiency cars, is the classic case in point of how far Google Ventures can miss the mark.

 Last year Google Ventures joined a $66.26 million round raised by V-Vehicle, a then-stealthy company looking to make low-cost gas cars with higher-than-average efficiency and a plastic shell. David Drummond, Google’s Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Chief Legal Officer, is listed as on V-Vehicle’s SEC filing.
 Other investors in V-Vehicle include former oil baron T. Boone Pickens and Kleiner Perkins investors John Doerr and Ray Lane. As Liz points out in her article, one of the best ways to garner a Google Ventures investment is to work with one of the two VC firms that have closely aligned themselves with Google: Kleiner Perkins and August Capital.

Following along with Kleiner Perkins’ greentech investments isn’t always (or ever?) a good thing. As Josie has been chronicling, V-Vehicle had basically bet everything on securing $321.1 million in federal loans under the Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) loan program to set up manufacturing at an old General Motors-Guide Corp. plant in Monroe, Louisiana. But the DOE denied V-Vehicle’s loan application in March, much to the “surprise” of then V-Vehicle CEO and founder Frank Varasano. Varasano left the company soon after and Kleiner Perkins managing partner Ray Lane stepped in as temporary chief executive.

 Other green car startups — Tesla Motors and Fisker Automotive — have managed to secure loans under that DOE program. As Josie explained in this comparison chart, V-Vehicle brought to the table a shorter track record than even the earliest-stage awardee (Fisker), and V-Vehicle’s technology — a gas-powered, highly efficient car — represents a relatively small step away from fossil fuels, compared to the leap that could be possible with the electric vehicle tech that the DOE has supported in legacy player Nissan’s project.
V-Vehicle isn’t necessarily out of the game quite yet — it’s trying to raise another $100 million private investors and with such celebrity backers could turn itself around. But it’s clearly not a player that’s leading the pack — on advanced technology, on production goals, on partnerships, on raising needed funding . . . on really anything that’s been publicly revealed to date. Google.org, Google’s philanthropy arm, also invested in Aptera, the developer of three-wheeled hybrid and electric vehicles that will likely miss its previous goal of launching volume production in October 2009 by more than a year. Aptera also requested and has yet to receive $184 million through the ATVM loan program.

While Google isn’t normally expected to be an expert on what next-generation green technology will prevail, now that it’s placed itself alongside the greentech venture capital players of the world — which are trying to back the winners — it’s going to have to trek up the investing learning curve pretty quickly.

Image courtesy of Flickr user jardenberg’s photostream.

Deathwatch: V-Vehicle Loses CEO, Cancels Lease On Future Plant Site

Frank VarasanoFrank Varasano

UPDATE: See below

V-Vehicle Company — the startup automaker backed in part by oil baron-turned-wind baron-turned-CNG baron T. Boone Pickens — has dipped a few more toes in the deadpool. According to reports, V-Vehicle has not only lost its founder and CEO, Frank Varasano, but the company has also canceled its lease on a site outside Monroe, Louisiana where it planned to build a new manufacturing facility.

This is the latest in a string of bad news for V-Vehicle, which has been working since 2006 to accumulate the necessary capital to launch a line of new-tech vehicles. A couple of weeks ago, we learned that the Department of Energy had declined V-Vehicle’s $320 million application to the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Loan Program. That rejection had a domino effect, causing the State of Louisiana to withdraw its offer of $87 million in cash and other incentives. So, instead of ending the day with upwards of $450 million in the bank, V-Vehicle was left with only the $86.5 million it had raised from private investors like Mr. Pickens.

The media loves laughing at start-ups — especially brash ones like V-Vehicle, which has released very little information about its lineup of combustion-engined vehicles, other than to say that their fuel economy will “dramatically exceed any electric vehicles or any hybrid vehicles”. But ridicule is the easy road, and we’re not ready to take it just yet. Besides, there may be room for hope in V-Vehicle’s future.

Reports indicate that Varasano was fired from his CEO position, which could be read as a positive development. It shows that investors haven’t given up on the company, and they want to replace Varasano with someone better equipped to raise money and to put V-Vehicle on the right track. Had Varasano resigned, on the other hand, that would imply that the situation was so hopeless that even V-Vehicle’s founder — the man whose dreams and determination helped build the company — didn’t see a way out.

Also on the positive side, although V-Vehicle may have canceled the current lease on its future plant site, the company plans to renegotiate, taking into account the longer time-horizon necessary to finance and build the plant. What’s more V-Vehicle is working on a second application to the DOE’s ATVM low-interest loan program — one that will hopefully address some of the concerns that the DOE cited in its rejection. And finally, according to reports, the company began testing a prototype in February that claims to earn 40mpg and could launch with a sticker price of around $10,000.

To be fair, we’re not holding our breath on this project. In its rejection letter, the DOE cited concerns with V-Vehicle’s financial viability, and given the company’s precariously wobbly state right now, they might’ve been onto something. Still, we love rooting for an underdog, so we’re not giving up just yet. We’ll keep you posted.

UPDATE: April 6, 2010 —  “The new head of V-Vehicle Co. says the company will be going back to the federal Energy Department in a quest for $321.1 million in loans.”

Advertisements

One thought on “APPLICANT: V-Vehicle AKA VVC

  1. Pingback: (ARTICLE) Why is the nexus of almost every Cleantech Crash Crime at DOE Kliener Perkins and Google? – United States Department Of Energy Over-Watch Site

Leave a news link, news story or tip:

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s